Australia
Accepts the ABTC at every port of entry.
The card answers two separate questions, and almost every published list blurs them. Am I admitted here? is set by the economy. Do I skip the queue? is set by the airport. Look up any port for both answers, sourced and dated.
CAN and USA never pre-clear anyone, so they never appear on a card. Their lanes are open to visiting cardholders anyway.
The same table is copied across a hundred sites: an economy on the left, a few airport codes on the right. Read it the obvious way and the card works there and nowhere else. For most of APEC, that is simply wrong.
The APEC Secretariat’s own economy entry tables carry a column the copies leave out: ports of entry. Most economies admit cardholders at all of them. A minority restrict admission to a designated list, and those are the only places where landing at the “wrong” airport is a real problem.
An economy can, and most do, admit you everywhere while only giving you a shorter queue somewhere. This page keeps the two answers apart, marks every row with the kind of source it rests on, and says plainly where the public record runs out.
Plus two transitional members, Canada and the United States, which grant the lane but no entry right.
Every documented port around the Pacific Rim, coloured by what happens when you land. Select a dot for its verdict.
Every port we could document, including those that admit cardholders without offering a lane. That combination is common, and it is not a research gap. Open a row for its verdict.
The bars show how strong the source behind each row is. What each evidence level means.
Each economy sets its own rules: where the card admits you, how long you may stay, and what the card replaces.
Accepts the ABTC at every port of entry.
Its Immigration Department confirms, in Malay, a ‘laluan cepat’ (fast-track lane) at Brunei International, the sole international airport.
An asymmetric arrangement: visiting cardholders get the arrivals lane, not pre-cleared entry.
A full participant; the card is valid at all Chilean ports.
A 60-day visa-free business stay, and the card is accepted at all ports of entry.
A full member; the card is valid at all control points.
Publishes its own two-tier list: checkpoints with a dedicated APEC lane (‘Jalur Khusus’) and those that accept the card without one.
Visa-free entry for pre-cleared cardholders at all ports of entry.
Valid for entry at all ports, and the lane extends to up to three companions.
One of the few economies where the named list is legally load-bearing: APEC records it as ‘Designated Only’.
A full member, unlike the US and Canada. INM issues the card as a ‘multivisa’ valid up to five years.
Immigration NZ confirms dedicated APEC lanes on arrival and departure, but names no airport.
The strictest of the designated-port economies.
Fast-track rests on an explicit legal mandate rather than a currently documented physical lane.
A founding participant of the 1997 trial; valid at all ports, not a designated subset.
Visa-free entry and priority border control by law, but no published list of lane airports.
No documented separate APEC lane any more. Its value is the visa waiver, not the queue.
A full member; the card is valid at all ports of entry.
90 days, valid at all ports. The lane picture matches no published list, in either direction.
An asymmetric arrangement: visiting cardholders get the lane, not pre-cleared entry.
Valid at all border gates by air, land and sea, for 90 days per entry.
APEC published a per-economy lane list exactly once, in March 2007. It no longer exists on apec.org, and every APEC-wide list you can find today descends from it.
Three live changes no published guide reflects yet. Each is dated, because an undated “recent change” rots into a false claim.
Every row was checked against current sources on that date, and a row with none says 2007 record. Lane locations, terminal assignments and designated-port lists change without announcement, so confirm anything you are about to travel on.